CentiMaga2 points-6 hours ago edited 3 minutes ago You can monitor the EPA's annual air pollution measurements for SO2 NO2 lead particulate matter and more online here httpswwwepagovai the cleanest in almost century There's a reason the Clean Air Act &Clean Water Act are still popular and no one has ever proposed repealing them Edit 1 allowing permittees to be reclassified if they cut emissions is not a repeal 2 nor is undoing a 2015 expansion under the CWA 3 nor is undoing a 2015 expansion under the CAA All trend heavily downward reflecting the fact that US air is Reply Share Save Edit 6 points 6 hours ago ? Is this a joke? There's a reason the Clean Air Act & Clean Water Act are still popular and no one has ever proposed repealing them The entire Republican Party environmental agenda is to weaken dismantle and repeal environmental regulation at the behest of their donors Clean Air Act under attack htt The Trump administration announced Thursday it is doing away with a decades-old air emissions policy opposed by fossil fuel companies a move that environmental groups say will result in more pollution Clean Water Act under attack httpswwwepagovw The agencies' proposal is the second step in a two-step process to review and revise the definition of waters of the United States consistent with the February 2017 Presidential Executive Order entitled Restoring the Rule of Law Federalism and Economic Growth by Reviewing the 'Waters of the United States' Rule Reply Give Award Share Report Save CentiMaga1 point- 6 hours ago edited 3 minutes ago The 1st rule change allows permittees to change their emission classification when they reduce how much they emit which makes sense The 2nd rule change undid a 2015 rule that expanded the CWA to pluvial accumulations & wetlands and is expected replace it this year with a more limited expansion Neither of these repealing the Clean AirWater Act This also isn't an appropriate forum to push your politics Reply Share Save Edit oScore hidden 5 hours ago This also isn't an appropriate forum to push your politics But it is the appropriate forum to push your politics? There's a reason the Clean Air Act &Clean Water Act are still popular and no one has ever proposed repealing them Nice attempt at gaslighting here thankfully actually no one is buying that no one has ever proposed repealing CAA or CWA Reply Give Award Share Report Save CentiMaga-2 points 4 hours ago edited 2 minutes ago ? The Clean Air & Water Acts are popular No legislator has submitted any bill to repeal them No executive notice has proposed repealing them SO2 NO2 CO PM25 PM10 Lead & all other priority pollutant emission restrictions remain in force and facts gress at EPAgov and even view unitless indexed data at AirNowgov These are Neither of your citations supported your claims of attacks Reply Share Save Edit ytScore hidden 2 hours ago These aren't my words Attack on the Clean Air Act are the words of 2505 scientists who jointly signed this letter Reply Give Award Share Report Sa CentiMaga 2 point Attack was your word And your rs t cite wasn't an Attack in Clean Air nor your 2nd an Attack on Clean Wat no Attack on the Clean Air Actthe letter demands the EPA add CO2 to its list of pollutants That's an expansio Are you genuinely unable to understand how unscie c deceptive & propagandized your points have bee Score hidden 1 hour ago n Air Act and relevant Supreme Court c In 2007 in Massachusetts v EPA the Supreme Court held that EPA under the CAA should eval greenhouse gases This is not an expa s what EPA was obli 1990 under the CAA Amendments signed into law n 2009 EPA completed its eval ng regarding gr nho wa rmed in another SC case Utility Air Regulatory Group v Environme Protection Agency gency n of CAA authority it is a requireme CO2 regulatio including CO2 and other greenhouse ga CAA's capacious de der the law to evaluat the Supreme Court greenhouse gas t well within the Reply Give Award Share Report Save CentiMaga1 poin 7 minutes ago edited 1 minute ago ? Greenhouse gases have literally never been regulated under the CAA Expanding regulations to list them as air pollutants is Reversal first claim of an attack wa se it was a t was a repeal of 2015 r nged your aims and moved your goalposts yet your third claim is se uth despite your deceptio the CAA & CWA remain popular and no one s epeal them or reverse thei Reply Share Save Edit A wild BRAINLESS SHILL has appeared!! Will you FIGHT his lies or FLEE? Meme

Facts

Party

Politics

Supreme

wat

Republican Party

Supreme Court

Definition

Fossil

Limited

Massachusetts

Trump

United

Water

Wild

Word

Old

Change

Entitled

Never

Reason

Nice

Fight

Been

hidden

how

united states

another

epa

add

definition of

air

act

step

lead

data

republican

who

push

policy

bee

can

list

caa

fuel

one

law

group

case

online

force

cwa

co2

executive order

the words

will

score

them

edit

move

all

first

clean air act

pm2.5

review

clean water act

they

words

you

court

bill

cite

agency

what

still

proposal

order

for

fossil fuel

share

air pollution

www

executive

waters

pollution

states

companies

reversal

administration

scientists

reply

economic growth

rule of law

greenhouse gas

economic

more

popular

this

clean

lies

list of

joke

this is

well

february

thursday

are you

away

flee

including

expected

makes sense

appeared

relevant

literally

gaslighting

genuinely

their

ever

matter

so2

shill

htt

consistent

emit

federalism

claim

repeal

forum

two step

fact

century

agenda

dismantle

utility

minute

appropriate

almost

no

hours

minutes

yet

understand

say

ago

year

much

this year

of the united states

two

award

monitor

the supreme

greenhouse gases

fossil-fuel-companies

point

attack

decades

is this a joke

moved

letter

step in

And

Other

Here

Gas

When

Actually

That

But

Not

Cut

Growth

Is This

Priority

Presidential

Environmental

How Much

Give

The

Points

4 Hours

Protection

The Law

Your

Authority

Report

Save

Its

Emissions

Gency

Reverse

5 Hours

These

The Fact That

Gov

Brainless

Uth

Poin

Acts

Clean Water

Thats

Was

With

Expansion

Expanding

Result

Rule

Der

In A

Annual

Should

Are

Have

Edited

Replace

Sense

The Definition

Also

1 Hour

An Attack

Nor

Https

Amendments

Us Air

Which

Greenhouse

Measurements

View

Process

No2

Has

Groups

Classification

Fuel Companies

Held

The Definition Of

The United States

Theres

The Trump

Doing

Within

Second

Buying

No One

Even

His

Agencies

Downward

It Was

Behest

Eval

Heavily

Legislator

Neither

Revise

Trend

1St

3 Minutes

A Wild

Actually No

And Is

And More

Any

But It

Citations

Clean Air

Completed

Expanded

February 2017

Into

Is A

Is Not

It Is

It Was A

Not A

Notice

One Is

Remain

Arent

Attempt

Capacious

Deceptive

Despite

Emission

Entire

Hour

Isnt

Jointly

Opposed

Particulate

Pluvial

Pollutant

Reduce

Regarding

Regulation

Result In

Signed

Thankfully

Third

To Be

found ON 2019-04-15 17:22:18 BY loveforquotes.com

source: reddit