CentiMaga2 points-6 hours ago edited 3 minutes ago You can monitor the EPA's annual air pollution measurements for SO2 NO2 lead particulate matter and more online here httpswwwepagovai the cleanest in almost century There's a reason the Clean Air Act &Clean Water Act are still popular and no one has ever proposed repealing them Edit 1 allowing permittees to be reclassified if they cut emissions is not a repeal 2 nor is undoing a 2015 expansion under the CWA 3 nor is undoing a 2015 expansion under the CAA All trend heavily downward reflecting the fact that US air is Reply Share Save Edit 6 points 6 hours ago ? Is this a joke? There's a reason the Clean Air Act & Clean Water Act are still popular and no one has ever proposed repealing them The entire Republican Party environmental agenda is to weaken dismantle and repeal environmental regulation at the behest of their donors Clean Air Act under attack htt The Trump administration announced Thursday it is doing away with a decades-old air emissions policy opposed by fossil fuel companies a move that environmental groups say will result in more pollution Clean Water Act under attack httpswwwepagovw The agencies' proposal is the second step in a two-step process to review and revise the definition of waters of the United States consistent with the February 2017 Presidential Executive Order entitled Restoring the Rule of Law Federalism and Economic Growth by Reviewing the 'Waters of the United States' Rule Reply Give Award Share Report Save CentiMaga1 point- 6 hours ago edited 3 minutes ago The 1st rule change allows permittees to change their emission classification when they reduce how much they emit which makes sense The 2nd rule change undid a 2015 rule that expanded the CWA to pluvial accumulations & wetlands and is expected replace it this year with a more limited expansion Neither of these repealing the Clean AirWater Act This also isn't an appropriate forum to push your politics Reply Share Save Edit oScore hidden 5 hours ago This also isn't an appropriate forum to push your politics But it is the appropriate forum to push your politics? There's a reason the Clean Air Act &Clean Water Act are still popular and no one has ever proposed repealing them Nice attempt at gaslighting here thankfully actually no one is buying that no one has ever proposed repealing CAA or CWA Reply Give Award Share Report Save CentiMaga-2 points 4 hours ago edited 2 minutes ago ? The Clean Air & Water Acts are popular No legislator has submitted any bill to repeal them No executive notice has proposed repealing them SO2 NO2 CO PM25 PM10 Lead & all other priority pollutant emission restrictions remain in force and facts gress at EPAgov and even view unitless indexed data at AirNowgov These are Neither of your citations supported your claims of attacks Reply Share Save Edit ytScore hidden 2 hours ago These aren't my words Attack on the Clean Air Act are the words of 2505 scientists who jointly signed this letter Reply Give Award Share Report Sa CentiMaga 2 point Attack was your word And your rs t cite wasn't an Attack in Clean Air nor your 2nd an Attack on Clean Wat no Attack on the Clean Air Actthe letter demands the EPA add CO2 to its list of pollutants That's an expansio Are you genuinely unable to understand how unscie c deceptive & propagandized your points have bee Score hidden 1 hour ago n Air Act and relevant Supreme Court c In 2007 in Massachusetts v EPA the Supreme Court held that EPA under the CAA should eval greenhouse gases This is not an expa s what EPA was obli 1990 under the CAA Amendments signed into law n 2009 EPA completed its eval ng regarding gr nho wa rmed in another SC case Utility Air Regulatory Group v Environme Protection Agency gency n of CAA authority it is a requireme CO2 regulatio including CO2 and other greenhouse ga CAA's capacious de der the law to evaluat the Supreme Court greenhouse gas t well within the Reply Give Award Share Report Save CentiMaga1 poin 7 minutes ago edited 1 minute ago ? Greenhouse gases have literally never been regulated under the CAA Expanding regulations to list them as air pollutants is Reversal first claim of an attack wa se it was a t was a repeal of 2015 r nged your aims and moved your goalposts yet your third claim is se uth despite your deceptio the CAA & CWA remain popular and no one s epeal them or reverse thei Reply Share Save Edit A wild BRAINLESS SHILL has appeared!! Will you FIGHT his lies or FLEE? Meme

Facts

Party

Politics

Supreme

wat

Republican Party

Supreme Court

Definition

Fossil

Limited

found ON 2019-04-15 17:22:18 BY loveforquotes.com

source: reddit